View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Scandum Site Admin
Joined: 03 Dec 2004 Posts: 3844
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:05 am Post subject: TinTin++ 2.00.0 |
|
|
Code: |
list.c Changed substitution order for #list add to substitute before
breaking up the arguments.
tinexp.c Added escaping of existing functions using @@
tokenize.c Added tokenization of #regex.
data.c A trigger's priority can now be a floating point numbers.
tinexp.c Fixed COMMAND_SEPARATOR related bug introduce in 1.99.9.
misc.c Added escape substitutions to vt row echo calls.
buffer.c Added #buffer get option.
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
louipc
Joined: 16 Jul 2006 Posts: 65
|
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:30 pm Post subject: Re: TinTin++ 2.00.0 |
|
|
Scandum wrote: | Code: |
data.c A trigger's priority can now be a floating point numbers.
|
|
What's a practical application for this? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Scandum Site Admin
Joined: 03 Dec 2004 Posts: 3844
|
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
No idea about a practical application.
If you have an action at a priority of 1, and another one at 2, and you want one in between, instead of changing the priorities of several actions you can simply set the new action to 1.5.
And this seemed more flexible and less intrusive than changing the default priority to 50, like zmud did. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tangobravo
Joined: 02 Jan 2010 Posts: 37 Location: TorilMUD
|
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmmm... The #BUFFER GET function sure sounds like it COULD be useful.... but so far, I haven't figured out exactly how it works. Any uber-simple examples you could show? =) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Scandum Site Admin
Joined: 03 Dec 2004 Posts: 3844
|
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 11:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sure:
Code: |
#alias test {#showme bli;#showme bla;#showme blo}
#act {blo} {#buffer get var 1 2;#showme preceding lines: $var[1] $var[2]}
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tangobravo
Joined: 02 Jan 2010 Posts: 37 Location: TorilMUD
|
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That is PRECISELY what I needed I have ALOT of things that can benefit from this.......
You, sir, are THE MAN.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Scandum Site Admin
Joined: 03 Dec 2004 Posts: 3844
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pasta
Joined: 15 Feb 2010 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 7:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
It appears that the OSX version linked to on the download page, even though it claims to be 2.00.0, is really 1.99.9.....? Or am I doing something really wrong when I'm unpacking it on my OSX machine?
Code: |
[pasta@osxbox ~/Downloads]$ tar -ztvf tintin-2.00.0-osx.tar.gz
-rwxr-xr-x 0 jstock staff 749412 Feb 16 21:59 tt++
[pasta@osxbox ~/bin]$ /bin/ls -lF tt++
-rwxr-xr-x@ 1 mike staff 749412 Mar 19 07:44 tt++*
|
But when I start it up:
Code: | [pasta@osxbox ~/bin]$ ./tt++
(Ad snipped)
#####################################################################
# #
# T I N T I N + + 1.99.9 #
# #
# (T)he k(I)cki(N) (T)ickin d(I)kumud clie(N)t #
# #
# Code by Peter Unold, Bill Reis, David A. Wagner, #
# Rob Ellsworth, Jeremy C. Jack, and Igor van den Hoven. #
# #
#####################################################################
|
Is there some type of "#version" or "#showme {$tt_version}" that would actually print off "2.00.0" if that's the version I'm using? Is it simply a case of forgetting to update the version string in the OSX version of the source code or something else simple like that?
-Pasta
Last edited by Pasta on Sat Mar 20, 2010 10:05 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Scandum Site Admin
Joined: 03 Dec 2004 Posts: 3844
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's the 2.00.0 version. Forgot to update the version before emailing it to the friend who compiles the OS X binary for me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pasta
Joined: 15 Feb 2010 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks. Much appreciated.
-Pasta |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|